Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cica!ctrsol!uakari!indri!caesar!blake!ndsuvax!ncoverby From: ncoverby@ndsuvax.UUCP (Glen Overby) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: Re: minix-l vs info-minix Summary: minix-l == info-minix Message-ID: <2786@ndsuvax.UUCP> Date: 12 Jul 89 20:25:35 GMT References: <19501@louie.udel.EDU> Reply-To: ncoverby@ndsuvax.UUCP (Glen Overby) Organization: North Dakota State University, Fargo Lines: 16 In article <19501@louie.udel.EDU> Peter_Van_Epp@cc.sfu.ca writes: > Now for the question: on Bitnet should we be sending replies to the > list to info-minix@udel.edu or minix-l@ndsuvm1. If you send to minix-l@ndsuvm1, it gets forwarded to info-minix@udel.edu. You are correct about postings to minix-l from bitnet not going thru any gateways. It would really be nice if the Bitnet people would quit doing mailing lists and join the rest of the world in running a real news system. Bruce Evans posted his stuff directly to Usenet. I dont know why the postings aren't in bugs' archives, but they are on vm1.nodak.edu (aka ndsuvm1 on bitnet). You can get them via listserv or anonymous ftp. See the Minix Information Sheet for instructions on accessing via listserv. -- Glen Overby uunet!ndsuvax!ncoverby (UUCP) ncoverby@ndsuvax (Bitnet)