Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!maytag!aries5!giguere From: giguere@aries5.uucp (Eric Giguere) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Tools for writing manuals... Message-ID: <299@maytag.waterloo.edu> Date: 11 Jul 89 16:23:11 GMT References: <8155@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> <3161@wpi.wpi.edu> <1187@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu> Sender: daemon@maytag.waterloo.edu Reply-To: giguere@aries5.waterloo.edu (Eric Giguere) Organization: Computer Systems Group, University of Waterloo Lines: 25 Yes, a lot of people on the net use AmigaTeX and can attest to how wonderful it is. The portability factor is an extremely big plus from my point of view. If you want more information on AmigaTeX see my review in the Transactor for the Amiga a few months back. The June issue of the TransAmi also has an article showing off what you can do with LaTeX using AmigaTeX. If you have access to neither copy I could mail the original text of my review to anyone who wants it. Tom Rokicki, the author of AmigaTeX, reads this group regularly and can answer any questions. He can also be reached on BIX as radical.eye (Radical Eye Software is his company name.) One point that should be mentioned, though, is that using LaTeX (or TeX) may not suit your purposes for several reasons. One of them is that you'll probably want your own documentation style created, which means hacking up one of the standard LaTeX styles --- hard to do from scratch. Another big reason is that currently --- Tom is working on this, though --- TeX really has no support for more than simple graphics. If your documentation is graphics-intensive then TeX may not be the way to go at the current time. (Mind you, I'm not sure what is. Most DTP programs are only designed to handle a few pages, really, and are unsuited for long documents. At least this is what I've concluded.) Eric Giguere 268 Phillip St #CL-46 For the curious: it's French ("jee-gair") Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6G9 Bitnet : GIGUERE at WATCSG (519) 746-6565 Internet: giguere@aries5.UWaterloo.ca "Nothing but urges from HELL!!"