Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!bu-cs!bucsb!bear
From: bear@bucsb.UUCP (Blair M. Burtan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re:  Anyone at psygnosis....
Message-ID: <2778@bucsb.UUCP>
Date: 12 Jul 89 17:50:41 GMT
References: <18831@louie.udel.EDU>
Reply-To: bear@bucsb.bu.edu (Blair M. Burtan)
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga
Organization: Boston Univ Comp. Sci.
Lines: 14

In article <18831@louie.udel.EDU> pfaff@gemini.asd.contel.com (Ray Pfaff - Oakwood 457 934-8162) writes:
>Gregory Simmons writes a rather scathing message about Psygnosis.  I too
>just wanted to say that I won't buy another Psygnosis game.  With the 
>exception of "Ballistix" (and even that only in two player mode), every 
>Psygnosis game I either bought or demoed has had great sound, great graphics
>.... and little or no playability.  If these guys ever got their act to-
>gather and acutally wrote a game that played as well as they looked, they'd
>make a fourtune.

I wouldn't rule Ballistix out.  Even though the game is nifty, it
is riddled with bugs.  What can you say to a game that scores
a win without the ball going in the goal?

                                     - Bear