Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!udel!mvac23!thomas
From: thomas@mvac23.UUCP (Thomas Lapp)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: software for sending mail XENIX to DOS pc's
Message-ID: <51.UUL1.3#5131@mvac23.UUCP>
Date: 8 Jul 89 00:03:00 GMT
References: <208@arnor.UUCP>
Reply-To: mvac23!thomas@udel.edu
Organization: MultiVac23, Newark, DE, U.S.A.
Lines: 28

> > the asking. UULINK is $335.
> >              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> Well, that's exactly what I didn't mean. First - it's not for me, I just repliedto someone's asking for help. Second - UULINK for $335 doesn't look like UUPC 
> for grant at all - does it? I thought I said clearly: please, those who keep
> UUPC or know where it is - show up! Well, UULINK may be a good package - but
> I doubt if somebody with access to both will chose that one. Anyway, thanks

Wrong.  As you can see by mail header, mvac23 is running UULINK.  The system
also ran UUPC for 6 months before installing UULINK.  Believe me, the
difference is great.  UUPC is basically for one machine, one user. UULINK
is for multiple PC's connected by phone or direct link, and support multiple
accounts per machine (of course you DO have to buy a copy for each machine,
but $335 is quantity one pricing).  So with UULINK, you can set up your own
uucp network, and at the same time, connect with outside world and give all
machines net.access.

I've tried both, and like UULINK a lot better.  Only thing mission from UULINK
IMHO is a program for receiving news and reading it in a manner a la 'vn' or
'nn'.  But, hey, it can still read and send Usenet news if you give it a file
in a form it likes....


                         - tom
==============================================================================
uucp:     ...!udel!mvac23!thomas    ! Internet: mvac23!thomas@udel.edu
Location: Newark, DE, USA           !      or   mvac23%thomas@udel.edu
==============================================================================