Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-sdd!trwrc!agnew
From: agnew@trwrc.UUCP (Robert A. Agnew)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Subject: FPU Overflow
Keywords: NS32000 FPU Overflow
Message-ID: <528@trwrc.UUCP>
Date: 12 Jul 89 16:04:17 GMT
Organization: TRW-MEAD, San Diego, Ca.
Lines: 3

The 32k FPU status word has a trap enable for underflow and inexact
result. Do either of these fileds control trapping on overflow or
does floating overflow always cause a trap?