Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU!jim
From: jim@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Jim Fulton)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: any attempt to standardize Imake.rules for releases of X source?
Message-ID: <8907101414.AA07633@expo.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: 10 Jul 89 14:14:37 GMT
References: <1574@ics.COM>
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Organization: X Consortium, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Lines: 11


> The increased emphasis on the use of imake in R4 has led me to wonder
> whether there is a tacit assumption that all Imakefiles are based on
> the same Imake.rules file? 

We try to keep the MIT Imake.rules compatible from release to release (from the
Imakefile writer's perspective).  People who need enhancements should
send mail to me.  But, the rules file does have to evolve as new types
of operations are added.

Jim