Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU!jim
From: jim@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Jim Fulton)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: X Windows (tm)
Message-ID: <8907131901.AA21697@expo.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: 13 Jul 89 19:00:59 GMT
References: <1137@mailrus.cc.umich.edu>
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Organization: X Consortium, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science
Lines: 7


> [Quest is claiming "X Windows" as a trademark and generally being sloppy about
> attributing trademarks.]

It has been a little while since I last looked into trademark regulations, but
I suspect that the overwhelming number of examples of prior use of the the phrase
"X Windows" would make such a trademark claim difficult to defend.