Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!rice!kalliope!bbc
From: bbc@titan.rice.edu (Benjamin Chase)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
Subject: Re: repeat counts and ^X )
Message-ID: <BBC.89Jul11145320@titan.rice.edu>
Date: 11 Jul 89 19:53:20 GMT
References: <8907110336.AA15988@gibbs.physics.purdue.edu>
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Rice University
Lines: 8
In-reply-to: ray@GIBBS.PHYSICS.PURDUE.EDU's message of 11 Jul 89 03:36:50 GMT

I think the notion of supplying the repeat count to end-kbd-macro was
wrong in the first place.  Although it requires more forethought, it
seems sensible to me to supply the repeat count before starting the
macro definition.

--

	Ben Chase, Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, Texas