Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!shelby!agate!ucbvax!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!GIBBS.PHYSICS.PURDUE.EDU!ray
From: ray@GIBBS.PHYSICS.PURDUE.EDU (Ray Moody)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
Subject: Re: repeat counts and ^X )
Message-ID: <8907121811.AA00824@gibbs.physics.purdue.edu>
Date: 12 Jul 89 18:11:22 GMT
References: <BBC.89Jul11145320@titan.rice.edu>
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Purdue Univ. Physics Dept., W. Lafayette, IN
Lines: 10

In article <BBC.89Jul11145320@titan.rice.edu>, bbc@titan (Benjamin Chase) writes:
>I think the notion of supplying the repeat count to end-kbd-macro was
>wrong in the first place.  Although it requires more forethought, it
>seems sensible to me to supply the repeat count before starting the
>macro definition.

    But supplying a repeat count to start-kbd-macro means to append to
the last macro definition instead of defining a new keyboard macro.

								Ray