Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!ukc!icdoc!qmc-cs!flash
From: flash@cs.qmc.ac.uk (Flash Sheridan)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Abusive news article
Summary: appropriately abusive
Keywords: mental cripples re: "can" vs. "may" & authority
Message-ID: <1157@sequent.cs.qmc.ac.uk>
Date: 12 Jul 89 19:10:47 GMT
References: <580@axis.fr>
Reply-To: @nsf.ac.uk:flash@cs.qmc.ac.uk
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Mathematical Institute, Oxford OX1-3LB
Lines: 28

philip@axis.fr (Philip Peake) writes:


>In article <1139@sequent.cs.qmc.ac.uk> appeared the following:
>}In article <571@axis.fr> philip@axis.fr (Philip Peake) writes:
>}>In article <3631@ddsw1.MCS.COM>, karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) writes:
>I really don't understand what is being said here - if anyone else does,
>I would be glad to know.

It meant that (a) your thinking (or writing) was insufficiently careful, and
(b), that you recommend obedience to abuses of governmental authority.

>I have the feeling that I am being insulted ?
>If so why ? and what is it supposed to add to the discussion ?

If the shoe fits...  [I admit that reasonable men can differ on (b). I'm an
American living in England; we've sometimes differed with them.]

>If you don't have anything sensible or constructive to say, then just
>keep your fingers off the keyboard !

Please read & write more carefully before posting.  I've been asked to take
this argument off-line, which is where your complaint belonged, if anywhere.
-- 
---
From: flash@cs.qmc.ac.uk (Flash Sheridan)
Reply-To: sheridan@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk
Portal,MacNet: FlashsMom