Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!kth!sunic!dkuug!tidk!storm
From: storm@texas.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: Proliferation of "Re^n:" in subject lines
Message-ID: <356@texas.dk>
Date: 5 Jul 89 17:31:13 GMT
References: <272@ncis.tis.llnl.gov> <WISNER.89Jul2113412@anableps.berkeley.edu> <KIM.89Jul4095723@kannel.lut.fi>
Organization: Texas Instruments, Denmark
Lines: 17

In article <KIM.89Jul4095723@kannel.lut.fi> kim@kannel.lut.fi (Kimmo Suominen) writes:

>I never (NEVER) seem to get multiple Re's on the subject line and I've never
>seen them (only Re: Re^x).

And these will also disappear when I issue patch #4 for nn.

The consensus on the net is to nuke Re^n: and I will do that (look at
the Subject: line of this article.)

Patch #4 will also allow the inclusion of the article-id in the 
"... writes:" line for those who wants it (see the first line of this
article.)
-- 
Kim F. Storm        storm@texas.dk        Tel +45 429 174 00
Texas Instruments, Marielundvej 46E, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
	  No news is good news, but nn is better!