Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bloom-beacon!basser.cs.su.OZ.AU!gregr
From: gregr@basser.cs.su.OZ.AU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Submission for rec-music-gaffa
Message-ID: <8907092329.14162@munnari.oz.au>
Date: 9 Jul 89 23:27:16 GMT
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 23
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Path: basser!gregr
From: gregr@basser.oz (Greg Ryan)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: watch out for cd labelling
Summary: mastering the beatles
Message-ID: <2336@basser.oz>
Date: 9 Jul 89 23:27:15 GMT
References: <8907071720.AA00160@godiva.goldhill.com>
Organization: Dept. of Comp. Science, Uni of Sydney, Australia
Lines: 12

In article <8907071720.AA00160@godiva.goldhill.com>, rpk@goldhill.COM writes:
> 
> But weren't they indeed digitally remixed ?  [referring to Beatles CDs]

You may be right when it comes to Sgt Peppers, but the earlier releases 
quickly had adhesive stickers slapped on them by EMI correcting the ADD to 
AAD.  I think this is borne out by the fact that some were released in
mono, although remastered (possibly digitally faked) stereo versions were
in existence.  I recall much discussion in music production magazines
when these releases were first made because of this point.

                                        Greg Ryan (gregr@cs.su.oz.au)