Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!cat.cmu.edu!jps
From: jps@cat.cmu.edu (James Salsman)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Languages for System Calls
Message-ID: <5572@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 19 Jul 89 09:33:43 GMT
References: <8907190741.AA29850@wisdocs.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon
Lines: 16

In article <8907190741.AA29850@wisdocs.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il> oded@wisdom.weizmann.ac.IL (Oded Maler) writes:
> Anyway, who needs those Latin words - we know *we* are smarter than
> *you* whatever the semantics is (:-))

The tired old Latin/Hebrew/Arabic/Hindi/Chinese/etc. debate
is worse than vi versus Emacs and C versus Lisp combined.

Please redirect human language flames to talk.religion.misc,
and computer language flames to alt.religion.computers.

:James

Disclaimer:  I do not express the opinions of the university.
-- 

:James P. Salsman (jps@CAT.CMU.EDU)