Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!apple!kanner
From: kanner@Apple.COM (Herbert Kanner)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: References
Message-ID: <3079@internal.Apple.COM>
Date: 25 Jul 89 18:26:45 GMT
Organization: Development Systems Group, Apple Computer
Lines: 20

I wonder what the formal language rule is which forces the following
interpretation on

	int *&pl;

namely:  "pl is a reference to a pointer to an integer."  What disallows
the interpretation 

	int *(&pl); i.e. int pl;?

Finally, how about

	int &*pl;

Is pl here a pointer to a reference to an integer?
-- 
Herb Kanner
Apple Computer, Inc.
{idi,nsc}!apple!kanner
kanner@apple.com