Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!aplcen!haven!adm!cmcl2!phri!marob!cowan
From: cowan@marob.masa.com (John Cowan)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: forward references in typedefs
Message-ID: <24CB9E07.9547@marob.masa.com>
Date: 24 Jul 89 22:53:57 GMT
References: <55480@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1989Jul20.152935.14872@utzoo.uucp>
Reply-To: cowan@marob.masa.com (John Cowan)
Organization: ESCC,  New York City
Lines: 18

In article <1989Jul20.152935.14872@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
>...it's very unusual for different
>struct pointers to have different representations, so the compiler knows
>how big a pointer it's got even if it's not quite sure what it points to.)

For "very unusual" read "illegal".  As someone (Chris Torek?) said earlier
in this group, "all 'struct' pointers must 'smell' the same."  If this
behavior is not guaranteed, forward references to structs would be 
unimplementable in one pass.

Ufcawss, if you talk to the people who wrote VMS C, they'll tell you that
all one-pass implementations of C are unacceptable!  (This has something to
do with generating good code for the 'switch' statement.)
-- 
Internet/Smail: cowan@marob.masa.com	Dumb: uunet!hombre!marob!cowan
Fidonet:  JOHN COWAN of 1:107/711	Magpie: JOHN COWAN, (212) 420-0527
		Charles li reis, nostre emperesdre magnes
		Set anz toz pleins at estet in Espagne.