Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!ssbell!mcmi!amperif!unocss!ho@fergvax.unl.edu From: ho@fergvax.unl.edu (Michael Ho) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: TurboC 2.0 vs. TurboC Professional Message-ID: <1119@unocss.UUCP> Date: 24 Jul 89 17:48:00 GMT References: <14607@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> Sender: news@unocss.UUCP Reply-To: ho@fergvax.unl.edu Lines: 14 From article <14607@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>, by pete@northstar89.dartmouth.edu (Peter Schmitt): > What is the difference (besides price) between these two products. > Why would I want or need one over the other. Turbo C Professional == Turbo C 2.0 + Turbo Debugger + Turbo Assembler If you're going to be doing heavy work on big projects, or plan to do low-level systems work, I'd splurge for the Professional. Otherwise, it's a tossup. I have Pro, and I use the Debugger once in a while; it's saved some projects that I had given up for dead, so I think it's worth it. Depends on what you'll be doing. It's also nice to have an assembler around once in a while. --- ... Michael Ho, University of Nebraska