Xref: utzoo comp.arch:10770 comp.lang.misc:3114
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!mcvax!ukc!etive!aiai!jeff
From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton)
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Language Tenets (was Re: Double Width Integer Multiplication and Division
Message-ID: <604@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 22 Jul 89 16:21:30 GMT
References: <57125@linus.UUCP> <1989Jun24.230056.27774@utzoo.uucp> <13946@haddock.ima.isc.com> <1388@l.cc.purdue.edu> <13961@haddock.ima.isc.com> <147@ssp1.idca.tds.philips.nl> <1207@quintus.UUCP>
Reply-To: jeff@aiai.UUCP (Jeff Dalton)
Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
Lines: 8

In article <1207@quintus.UUCP> pds@quintus.UUCP (Peter Schachte) writes:
>CommonLisp, you may point out, does have multiple returns.  In fact,
>CommonLisp is a good example of the problem I'm pointing out.
>Basically, there's not much you can do with a multiple-value expression
>except ignore all but the first value (which happens if you nest a MV
>expression within a function call) and assign its results to variables.

Well, I often do other things with them.