Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hampvms.bitnet!JSHIN From: JSHIN@hampvms.bitnet ("Architecturally, Z-80 can be made to run at 100MHz!") Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm Subject: Uh-oh.... (was 7-bit Refresh) Message-ID: <8907240704.AA22884@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 23 Jul 89 17:32:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 31 Well, I am a currently enrolled student living in the college-provided housing (a.k.a. Dorms). It so happened that I had to move almost every semester and go home to Korea over the summer, which means that having databooks that fill a 4-by-six space was a drag, which lead me to "weed out" duplicate and "obsolete" copies. I knew I shouldn't have, but the "friends (like the recent popular music proclaims)" forced me to. I say, never trust your "friends!" I just realized that most companies have decided to cut back (or discontinue) on their 64-k DRAM products! The only databooks that list them are the old ones that I was about to have replaced! Which means, while the companies ARE still producing 64K DRAMS for "maintenance" purposes "ONLY," and those parts are available in the market, I don't have any data on them! 256-K DRAM's (even 64K by 4) are ALMOST WITHOUT EXCEPTION 256 cycle refresh, which means that they can NOT be used (with ease) with true Z80 (*&D#%ing, eh!). MY SUGGESTION, at this point, would be to use 32K by 8 STATIC RAMS (Hey, don't gasp...)!!! They are only $15 each, at most, these days int the mail-order world, and are getting faster by the day. Pseudo-static RAMS are not a bad idea, either. For your information, Hyundai made 256-cycle DRAMS, and Motorola and Oki made 128-cycle DRAMS. So did Mostek, but they merged with SGS-Thompson, and no DRAMS in their databook! All 128-cyclers are 2mS refresh. John Shin P.S. Like I said, it would be also a good idea to get the brand of the 64K parts from the shop and ask the manufacturer, although telling a 256K chip that it is a 64K ship isn't such a bad idea, either.