Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!cica!gatech!udel!mmdf
From: V61%DHDURZ1.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu (Ronald Lamprecht)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Guilty party exonerated
Message-ID: <20108@louie.udel.EDU>
Date: 20 Jul 89 16:46:37 GMT
Sender: mmdf@udel.EDU
Lines: 10

I as the author of the patches (the guilty party) would like to point out that
Erik Baalbergen <erikb@CS.UU.NL> in his article from 19 Jul 89
did exactly figure out the reasons why I did set $* and $< to a NULL string
for explicit rules. Within the old version it has been set to the result of
the last evaluated implicit rule and did only match the common expectations
for the embracing explicit rule in 90% by chance.

Bitnet:  V61@DHDURZ1                               Ronald Lamprecht
UUCP:    ...!unido!DHDURZ1.bitnet!V61              Theoretische Physik
ARPAnet: V61%DHDURZ1.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU       (Heidelberg, West Germany)