Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ncis.tis.llnl.gov!NRTC.NORTHROP.COM!Stef
From: Stef@NRTC.NORTHROP.COM (Einar Stefferud)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway
Subject: Re: Appendix A and spaces - another approach
Message-ID: <5198.617011842@nma.com>
Date: 21 Jul 89 08:10:42 GMT
References: <454.617008694@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Sender: root@ncis.tis.llnl.gov
Reply-To: Stef@nrtc.northrop.com
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 5
Approved: post-x400-gateway@tis.llnl.gov

I agree completely.  This is a UUCP/SMTP/RFC822 gateway problem and it
should be solved by the UUCP community, not the X.400 community.  Your
proposal puts the responsibility for dolution where it belongs.  I see
no way to support X.400 handstands to solve a problem between SMTP and
UUCP.  Onward!!!\Stef