Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ncis.tis.llnl.gov!CS.UCL.AC.UK!S.Kille
From: S.Kille@CS.UCL.AC.UK (Steve Kille)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway
Subject: Re: RFC 987 V 2.0
Message-ID: <11381.616841550@UK.AC.UCL.CS>
Date: 19 Jul 89 08:52:30 GMT
References: <8907171535.AA14655@jerry.inria.fr>
Sender: root@ncis.tis.llnl.gov
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 9
Approved: post-x400-gateway@tis.llnl.gov

Yes, you are quite right.  The wording implies that this mapping might be
omitted.   I'll tighten the wording.  

The detail of this message/some replies might confuse some of you, so can I
note:
   - there is no big deal here!
   - we did not discuss this point at the meeting

Steve