Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ncis.tis.llnl.gov!cwi.nl!piet
From: piet@cwi.nl (Piet Beertema)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway
Subject: Re: on x.400 address RFC draft
Message-ID: <8907190810.AA15148@sering.cwi.nl>
Date: 19 Jul 89 08:10:30 GMT
References: <897IH172601095*Robert.Ullmann@EN-C06.X400.Prime.COM>
Sender: root@ncis.tis.llnl.gov
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 16
Approved: post-x400-gateway@tis.llnl.gov


	The X.400 authority has already decreed 
"The" authority? Which authority?

	So the necessary coordination consists of ensuring that:
	1) 2nd level internet domains within top-level ISO-3166 ALPHA-2
	   domains do not use the ADMD names within that country.
It must be ensured that ADMD names within that country
do not coincide with 2nd level internet domains already
registered and in use in that country.
X.400 is a newcomer that shouldn't interfere with the
operation of a vast network (or set of networks) with
which they'll desperately need to communicate.


	Piet