Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!amiga.UUCP!romkey
From: romkey@amiga.UUCP (John Romkey)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: re: PC scorecard (and the NIC)
Message-ID: <8907252236.AA13484@asylum.sf.ca.us>
Date: 26 Jul 89 05:36:42 GMT
References: <8907252055.aa02491@Obelix.TWG.COM>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: romkey@asylum.sf.ca.us
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 10

I agree. I suggested adding more information on TCP/IP sources to the
scorecard long ago. I strongly believe that addresses and telephone
numbers be supplied for all appropriate entries.

If there's to be an argument, notice that the NIC publishes the
vendor's guide (whatever it's called this year), which lists that sort
of information, as a service to the TCP community. I think that
leaving out this information for the sake of limiting "commercialism"
is absurd.
				- john