Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!van-bc!rsoft!mindlink!a309 From: a309@mindlink.UUCP (George Lin) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Seagate (let's not get out of hand) Message-ID: <417@mindlink.UUCP> Date: 26 Jul 89 06:05:43 GMT Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada Lines: 40 > thad writes: > > Seems he chooses to overlook Caig Labs' (among others) instructions for the > application of such lubricant. > > Seems he doesn't spell well, either. > > Both failings are his problem. You are joking right? I didn't think anyone could think about spreading anything 5 molecules thick with a linin cloth. IF (a big IF) Caig Labs suggests application of a lubricant with a linin cloth (and not to mention 1 swipe of this linin cloth) don't try measuring thickness with molecules unless you're using DNA chains. Well, maybe you are right? Turtle Wax Labs does say to apply their lubricant with a cloth. And I often grease my pans with a cellulose based paper towel. Tell me,.... how smooth do you think a linin cloth is? Sure, amuse me and tell me the standard deviation in 'molecules'. There must be billions and billions (Carl ol' buddy) of 'lubricant' molecules on any surface if you can smell the lubricant. A molecule (well, more like thousands of molecules) of the lubricant must contact (fit into) cells in your nose for you to recognize it's scent. Now imagine taking a big breath in. Can you smell the lubricant? Well, if it was 5 molecules thick, it's now only 4 molecules thick. Please excuse any spelling errors. I post my messages at 2:30 in the morning and typos, missing 's'es, or missing prepositions are of little concern to me at this time. If spelling errors are what you look for... WELL, you should be delighted! I never bother to use the online spell checker, so you don't have to let your only talent go to waste. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please, get some REAL data, and stop measuring lubricant thickness with molecules.