Xref: utzoo comp.sys.apollo:3137 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:7807 comp.protocols.nfs:291 comp.sys.hp:2484 comp.protocols.misc:624
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!apollo!mishkin
From: mishkin@apollo.COM (Nathaniel Mishkin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.nfs,comp.sys.hp,comp.protocols.misc
Subject: Re: A comparison of Commercial RPC Systems
Summary: I hate cross postings too -- this is the last one
Keywords: RPC comparison apollo sun netwise
Message-ID: <449d9889.12879@apollo.COM>
Date: 24 Jul 89 18:18:00 GMT
References: <6569@joshua.athertn.Atherton.COM>
Reply-To: mishkin@apollo.com (Nathaniel Mishkin)
Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, MA
Lines: 17

In article <6569@joshua.athertn.Atherton.COM> joshua@Atherton.COM (Flame Bait) writes:
>I've finished work on a paper entitled "A Comparison of Commercial RPC
>Protocols" which I gave at NCF: The Network Computing Forum, and also
>as a work in progress at USENIX.
>
>It compares RPC (Remote Procedure Call) systems from Apollo, Sun and 
>Netwise for speed and dependablity.  I'm posting the paper (in troff 
>format) to comp.misc, so interested people can get it.  ...

I am seeking to end any cross-posting concerning this article by
posting my response to comp.protocols.misc.  I suggest all further
discussion take place there.

-- 
                    -- Nat Mishkin
                       Apollo Computer Inc., Chelmsford, MA
                       mishkin@apollo.com