Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!walt.cc.utexas.edu!nghiem From: nghiem@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Alex Nghiem) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: 80386 components/ BIOS summary Keywords: 80386 Motherboards BIOS Phoenix Award AMI Message-ID: <15744@ut-emx.UUCP> Date: 26 Jul 89 04:52:12 GMT References: <15617@ut-emx.UUCP> <15771@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <7449@athertn.Atherton.COM> Sender: news@ut-emx.UUCP Reply-To: nghiem@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Alex Nghiem) Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas Lines: 51 In article <7449@athertn.Atherton.COM> you write: 1>In article <15771@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> slin@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Steven Philip Lin) writes: 1> 1>>Micronics does not and has never used the AMI bios. Micronics sells 1>>sells Award version C3.04 and Pheonix Bios Plus 1.10 Revision 10 for their 1>>boards. Hope this clarification helps. 1> 1>For that matter, does any major brand name board maker use the AMI bios? 1>I don't think you will find it an any major brand name clones that I 1>know of, at least not Compaq or Everex. Who uses AMI besides the ^^^^^^^^ 1>inexpensive import clone builders? In the August 1989 issue of PC Magazine, there is a review of 80386SX machines. The only 80386SX in this review to get Editor's Choice was the Everex. The features tabulation states that the Everex BIOS is derived from the AMI BIOS. Technically, it is not an AMI BIOS as the BIOS in the Dell systems is not the same as the generic Phoenix 386 BIOS 1.10 due to propriety extensions or revisions. All of the Everex 80386 machines tested in the May 30, 1989 issue of PC Magazine had the AMI BIOS. (See p. 269) It was posted that the Phoenix BIOS had ROM Shadow problems: however, apparently this problem does not exist with the Dell systems. On a Dell system, it was posted that if the ROM Shadow is disabled, the 384k is accessable by VDISK. Dell also uses the Chips and Technologies chip set. Any problems other boards have with the loss of 384K to VDISK when the shadow is disabled may be due to the board itself and not the chip set. For those who reported that the Phoenix 386 BIOS had netware problems: The current version is advertised to be NOVELL and NETWARE compatible by Wholesale Direct. See p. 421, August '89 Computer Shopper. It should be noted that the goal of PC Magazine Editor's Choice and the Computer Shopper's Best Buy Awards is to report the best values for your money. Since AMI BIOS systems are generally cheaper that their Award or Phoenix counterparts, it should not be surprising that if the machine does what it is supposed to do it will end up with an Editor's Choice or Best Buy Award. In the PC Magazine May 30, 1989 Review of 80386 machines, the only three systems that got Editors Choice that did not have an AMI bios were Dell(customized Phoenix), Tandy(customized Phoenix), and IBM (IBM BIOS, of course!) See the features tabulation on p.272. No Editor's choice machine had the Award BIOS. nghiem@walt.cc.utexas.edu !cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!walt!nghiem