Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!sharkey!oxtrap!mudos!mju From: mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: TurboC 2.0 vs. TurboC Professional Message-ID: <582.24CE8D22@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> Date: 26 Jul 89 21:26:34 GMT Reply-To: mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us Organization: A neat desk is a sign of a crazy person. Lines: 25 In article <111700129@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>, mms00786@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu writes: >I believe the Turbo C professional, (and turbo pascal professional) come with the >Turbo Debugger and Turbo Assembler. (Not so sure about Turbo Assembler). Note that >Turbo C 2.0 already has a built in Debugger that I find adequate for most purposes. >The Turbo Debugger simply adds enhancements to the debugger in the environment. >Also, Turbo Assembler is quite nice, if you plan to write assembly routines. All of the "Turbo Professional" packages include a copy of the Turbo Debugger, as well as the stuff you get standard with the "Turbo " package. Note that Milan may have been confused, because the Turbo Assembler (*not* "Turbo Assembler Professional"; there is no such thing) comes with the Turbo Debugger. Since Turbo Assembler doesn't have an integrated edit/compile/debug environment like TC and TP do, I guess Borland felt that they had to include a debugger to keep their product line consistant (i.e., each program comes with a debugger -- TC and TP have it built-in, and TA comes with a separate program). -- Marc Unangst UUCP smart : mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us UUCP dumb : ...!uunet!sharkey!mudos!mju UUCP dumb alt.: ...!{ames,rutgers}!mailrus!clip!mudos!mju Internet : mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us