Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu!granston
From: granston@uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Imagewriter II vs. LQ
Message-ID: <43100013@uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu>
Date: 19 Jul 89 04:48:00 GMT
Lines: 17
Nf-ID: #N:uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu:43100013:000:681
Nf-From: uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu!granston    Jul 18 23:48:00 1989


Can someone post a comparison of the Imagewriter LQ to the Imagewriter
II? How does the Imagewriter LQ compare to the Imagewriter II
in terms of both quality and speed? I have a sample of Imagewriter II
output, but I can't find an Imagewriter LQ to try out.
How much better is the LQ printing quality? I've heard rumors
that the LQ in it's highest quality printing mode is "virtually
too slow to be usable"? Can anyone confirm or deny this?

I couldn't find a previous notestring discussing this.
However, if there has been a recent discussion on this topic,
could someone please e-mail me a copy of the notestring?

Thanks in advance!

Lani Granston
granston@uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu