Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!kth!draken!d88-jwa
From: d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Think's LSC generates slow code in comp with MPW C
Message-ID: <1331@draken.nada.kth.se>
Date: 21 Jul 89 16:16:43 GMT
References: <1630@eds.ericsson.se> <1853@cbnewsc.ATT.COM> <12252@eddie.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte)
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 18

In article <12252@eddie.MIT.EDU> rabbit@eddie.MIT.EDU (Warren J. Madden) writes:
>    Does Symantec have any plans to market an optimizing version of the LSC

Let's hope so !

>of us who feel the need for speed, such a product would allow us to stay in
>the LSC fold instead of defecting to MPW.

Just how much trouble is it really, compiling a finished program in
MPW when it's written in LSC. Couldn't be all that hard, could it ?
But then, you'd have to maintain two compilers :-(

Curious minds (including mine) want to know...

-- 
 __       Jon W{tte (The dread Smiley Shark) email:h+@nada.kth.se
/  \      (+46 (0) 8 258 268)
   /---   (c) 1989 Yessbox Allright Professional Products Inc. - Y.A.P.P.I.
  /       -- No More --