Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!trj From: trj@lll-lcc.UUCP (Terry Jones) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mips Subject: Re: Clarification Keywords: mips dec whoever Message-ID: <2554@lll-lcc.UUCP> Date: 24 Jul 89 18:02:25 GMT References: <2293@itivax.iti.org> Reply-To: trj@lll-lcc.llnl.gov.UUCP (Terry Jones) Followup-To: trj@lll-lcc.llnl.gov Distribution: comp Organization: Lawrence Livermore Labs, Comp Center, Livermore CA Lines: 41 In article <2293@itivax.iti.org> scs@itivax.iti.org (Steve C. Simmons) writes: > >Is this newsgroup exclusively for MIPS systems, or for >any systems which use their chip sets? We got a DEC 5810 >coming, and I'd be interested. > >First posting? First at this site, anyway. >-- >Steve Simmons scs@vax3.iti.org >Industrial Technology Institute Ann Arbor, MI. >"Velveeta -- the Spam of Cheeses!" -- Uncle Bonsai As the person that held the vote to create comp.sys.mips, I'll give you my opinion. The charter for the group was as follows: Provide a place for discussion of issues related to the products (including systems, chips, compilers, etc.) from MIPS Computer Inc. In addition, *relevant* topics about systems based on MIPS technology from other vendors are discussed. The intent of putting the word *relevant* in the charter was to keep the discussion relevant to products from MIPSco. Therefore, IMHO, questions regarding the instruction set, processor, and the like would be appropriate for comp.sys.mips; questions regarding the XMI bus and Ultrix would be more suited for comp.sys.dec. Is that clear as mud? terry ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- terry jones | lawrence livermore lab | POB 808 MS: L-67 | How much net work could a network work, Livermore, CA 94550 | if a network could net work? trj@lll-lcc.llnl.gov | trj@lll-crg.llnl.gov | - Jeffery DeMello (415) 423-9834 | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------