Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!tank!zaphod.uchicago.edu!barry From: barry@zaphod.uchicago.edu (Barry Merriman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Number Crunching on the Cube? Keywords: number crunch Message-ID: <4696@tank.uchicago.edu> Date: 27 Jul 89 23:31:40 GMT Sender: news@tank.uchicago.edu Reply-To: barry@zaphod.uchicago.edu (Barry Merriman) Distribution: usa Organization: Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of Chicago Lines: 53 _ _ How good is the Cube at pure number crunching? Does anyone have some benchmarks comparing it to, say, some flavor of Sun? Please post them if you do. If you have a Cube handy, try this trivial benchmark: Write a program that multiplies 1.000001 (double precision) against itself 10^6 times, and time it with the unix "time" command. Try it with and without the floating point chip. For comparison, here are the elapsed cpu times for some of our local Suns, and the inferred MFLOPage: [Notes: 68881 denotes the Motorola MC68881 floating point coprocessor; all runs were compiled with the -O optimization option on the f77 compiler, which makes about a factor of 4 improvement when using the MC68881.] ------------------------------------------------------------------ Machine (options) cpu time/sec MFLOPs Comments ------------------ ------------ ------ -------- Sun 3/50 101.4 0.01 Sun 3/50 (68881) 4.3 0.23 20x speedup Sun 3/60 66.1 0.015 Sun 3/60 (68881) 3.7 0.27 18x speedup Sun 3 Server 47.8 0.02 Sun 3 Server (68881) 3.5 0.29 14x speedup and, just for fun, our local throwback to the centralized computing era ELXSI 6400 2.1 0.48 cost > $200K NeXT Cube ??? ???? ??????????? ------------------------------------------------------------ Any info on Cube processing speeds (and the speed of the optical drive---measured in units of user pain) is appreciated. -thanks Barry Merriman University of Chicago, Dept of math