Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: eho@cognito.princeton.edu (Eric Ho)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: partitions (bad idea ??)
Keywords: SunOS
Message-ID: <329@brazos.Rice.edu>
Date: 19 Jul 89 06:32:43 GMT
Sender: root@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 15
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 8, Issue 80, message 14 of 15

Has anyone out there worked on filesystems that either eliminates
partitions.  The only reason that I can see to have the notion of
partitions around from the OS standpoint is to limit filesystem size (& to
make a filesystem) and maybe easier for doing backups.  The problem with
this approach is that the layout is pretty static -- everytime you need to
change the layout or mostly partition sizes, you'll have to backup that
disk, run format and restore everything again.  This is pretty stupid
really -- I mean if I want to expand one partition/filesystem into the
space previously occupied by another partition/filesystem, why should I've
to go thro' all the backup/restore hassels.

Eric Ho
Cognitive Science Lab.,		Princeton University
voice = 609-987-2819 (x2987)	email = eho@confidence.princeton.edu
					eho@bogey.princeton.edu