Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!lacey From: lacey@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu (John Lacey) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: a word-processor for UNIX Message-ID: <8484@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> Date: 24 Jul 89 21:36:58 GMT References: <20306@adm.BRL.MIL> <26558@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <8467@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <26567@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <1552@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu> Reply-To: lacey@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu (John Lacey) Organization: Cornell Theory Center, Cornell University, Ithaca NY Lines: 34 In article <1552@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu> mcclaren@herodotus.cs.uiuc.edu.UUCP (Tim McClarren) writes: >In article <8467@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> lacey@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu (John Lacey) writes: >> >>Perhaps a rough analogy with cameras might be drawn. More point-and-shoot >>cameras will be designed and sold than high end Nikon, Canon, Haselblad >>(sp?) machines and more people will process their film at K-Mart than at >>custom labs. Nevertheless, virtually all who work professionally will >>stick with the generally harder to use high end equipment. > >But then why is it that more and more I pick up a book, flip through a couple >of pages, and lo & behold, there it is right alongside the copyright and >Lib. of Congress info -- "This book written and typeset with a Macintosh II >and Microsoft Word" or some such? I dunno...maybe I read too much popular >lit./media, but I've not seen a whole lot of "This book written under vi, and >typeset with LaTeX/*roff on Bob & Jim's UNIX(c) box." Two things. First, I didn't write that, though I do think the example is a good one, and I might wish I had written it. Which brings us, of course, to your criticisms of the statement. Well, I don't why you are seeing more books printed with M-word Word, because I'm not. I own narry a one of them, whereas I own 7 books that used {La,AMS-,Plain }TeX, and I've seen several more. I think you are right, that perhaps you aren't reading high enough quality books [ 2/3 :-) ]. Also, and this is pure speculation on my part, perhaps you are not reading the _back_ pages, as half of my TeXed books inform me that they were so typeset at the end, rather than the beginning. Just a thought. Cheers, -- John Lacey | cornell!batcomputer!lacey lacey@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu | lacey@crnlthry.bitnet