Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!ctrsol!lll-winken!uunet!mcvax!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!ronald
From: ronald@ibmpcug.UUCP (Ronald Khoo)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: gov't certified "secure" Unix
Keywords: security
Message-ID: <11099@ibmpcug.UUCP>
Date: 24 Jul 89 17:34:15 GMT
References: <310@pwa-b.UUCP> <1038@riddle.UUCP>
Reply-To: ronald@ibmpcug.CO.UK (Ronald Khoo)
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.
Lines: 13

In article <1038@riddle.UUCP> andrew@riddle.UUCP (Andrew Beattie) writes:
>
>SCO UNIX 3.2 (Note that I said Unix not Xenix and 3.2 not 2.3)
>is designed to meet C2.

_designed_to_meet_ ?  Do you know if it will actually be *certified*
before they sell it?

(If so, I'll never buy it, secure un*x is a contradiction in terms :-) 8-)
-- 
Ronald.Khoo@ibmpcug.CO.UK (The IBM PC User Group, PO Box 360, Harrow HA1 4LQ)
Path: ...!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!ronald Phone: +44-1-863 1191 Fax: +44-1-863 6095
Disclaimer: With my opinion of PCs, ibmpcug probably disclaims knowledge of me!