Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!ked
From: ked@garnet.berkeley.edu (Earl H. Kinmonth)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: 720k 5.25 disks
Message-ID: <26601@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 24 Jul 89 03:16:21 GMT
References: <26353@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <196500031@trsvax> <786@biar.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: ked@garnet.berkeley.edu (Earl H. Kinmonth)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 28

>The comment wasn't aimed at Earl's machine, or Tandy's, but rather the
>typical AT clone.  Other people reading this might get confused.
>Earl's AT&T 6300+ is not a typical IBM clone.

Not a flame. Just a minor correction. I do not have a 6300+. I have a
6310. This is supposed to be a real AT clone. It does, however, handle
720K/5.25 disks without problem (so it is not a ~true~ clone). A true
blue machine is not so rational.

Just to get back to the original issue: moving 720/5.25 tar disks between
MSDOS and Xenix.  I have a solution, a German program, fdformat that
includes a utility that makes AT-clones behave rationally.  My version of
tar (with source code) remains available.  Cost == support == 0.00, but
this may double in the future.

(For best results use the uucp address; your mileage may vary.)

Earl H. Kinmonth
History Department
University of California, Davis
916-752-1636 (voice, fax [2300-0800 PDT])
916-752-0776 secretary

(bitnet) ehkinmonth@ucdavis.edu
(uucp) ucbvax!ucdavis!ucdked!cck
(telnet or 916-752-7920) cc-dnet.ucdavis.edu [128.120.2.251]
	request ucdked, login as guest,
	no password