Xref: utzoo gnu.ghostscript.bug:130 comp.windows.x:11886 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!flute.cs.uiuc.edu!grunwald From: grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu (Dirk Grunwald) Newsgroups: gnu.ghostscript.bug,comp.windows.x Subject: Ghostscript vs. `xps' Message-ID: Date: 27 Jul 89 18:13:09 GMT Sender: news@brutus.cs.uiuc.edu Reply-To: grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Lines: 10 Does anyone have both `ghostscript' and `xps' [with speedups, etc] running? Care to offer any commentary on e.g., completeness of implementation, speed and the like? I never got 1.3 to compile, so I rm'd the source. I've been using `xps' to preview postscript figures for a paper. Eventually, I'd like to make a postscript widget. Which would be the better base? -- Dirk Grunwald -- Univ. of Illinois (grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu)