Xref: utzoo sci.astro:4489 sci.space:12482 Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!dino!ceres!tjl From: TJL@ceres.physics.uiowa.edu Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.space Subject: Re: Possible evidence for life on Mars. Message-ID: <7037@ceres.physics.uiowa.edu> Date: 20 Jul 89 20:56:01 GMT References: <8907201621.AA00301@decwrl.dec.com> Organization: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa Lines: 37 In article <8907201621.AA00301@decwrl.dec.com>, klaes@wrksys.dec.com (CUP/ASG, MLO5-2/G1 6A, 223-3283) writes: > From the July 20, 1989 edition of THE BOSTON GLOBE - > > "Meteorite Revives Hopes There May Be Life on Mars" > > The possibility that life could have evolved on Mars, and perhaps > exists there now, has been given a boost by the discovery of large > amounts of organic material, the basis of all known life forms, in a > meteorite believed to have come from the red planet. > I have been curious about the possibility of life on Mars for awhile. My understanding of current theories on the origin of life on this planet is that life is thought to have originated in tidal pools or near the ocean surface. Both of these places have ample sunlight, rather calm water, yet would have the necessary chemicals for proteins and their precursors to form and combine. My question is that all of the pictures from Mars have been of river channels, river channels which apparently handled immense quantities of water. How would this environment (i.e. the river) compare with the ocean? If the water was flowing fast enough to carve these channels, would there also be areas where the water would be stagnant for a long enough period of time for proteins and the like to form? Have there been areas discovered which resemble a sea or ocean basin, but just have not received as much press? -- Joe "Those who would sacrifice ** I disclaim none of my opinions. liberty for security, ** deserve neither." ** DECnet CERES::TJL B. Franklin ** tjl@ceres.physics.uiowa.edu