Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!aero!randolph@Sun.COM From: randolph@Sun.COM (Randolph Fritz) Newsgroups: soc.feminism Subject: Re: The Power of Listening? Summary: Clarifications Message-ID: <117785@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> Date: 26 Jul 89 04:59:48 GMT References: <8907221627.AA27245@cognito.> <43171@bbn.COM> Sender: nadel@aerospace.aero.org Reply-To: elroy!ames!Sun.COM!randolph (Randolph Fritz) Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mountain View Lines: 30 Approved: nadel@aerospace.aero.org Status: R Richard, I very much appreciate your comments. Having had a few days reflection on my original posting I've been able to get a clearer idea of what the feminine form of the gaze might be. Of course, I was thinking of active, rather than passive, listening. Thinking it over, I think the grade-school teacher (the gaze *par excellence*), the housewife-mother (a lot of her job is surveillance), the wife asking "why are you so late?" with murder in her eye are indicators of the direction of my speculations. I was also thinking that it's striking that US men prefer intimate talking with women, rather than men. The figure of the mistress who knows all of her lover's secrets is firmly enshrined in US popular mythology & perhaps, even, she exists. Finally, just today I came across this letter in Science News: "Deceptive Successes in young children" (SN: 6/3/89, p.343) brought back memories of my time in the eighth grade. The teacher would leave the room and remind everyone to study and not talk. Naturally, conversations broke out. Upon her return she'd ask, "Who talked?" In every case the boys admitted their guilt, but never would a single girl admit to talking. The boys were punished with some exercise or other and the girls got off free for their lies. Michael V. Stratton Brea, Calif. Now, all of this is *not* proof. It, at most, hints that there may be something there. Which is what prompted me to post. ++Randolph Fritz sun!randolph || randolph@sun.com