Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!hplsla!davidr From: davidr@hplsla.HP.COM (David M. Reed) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: DESQview 386 Question Message-ID: <470005@hplsla.HP.COM> Date: 7 Aug 89 18:03:13 GMT References: <1681@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu> Organization: HP Lake Stevens, WA Lines: 29 If you use a question mark "?" as the last character in the Program Parameters field, DESQview will prompt the user for information before starting the application. This way you, for example, when DESQview starts your editor it will allow you to enter the name of the file you want to edit. As for memory allocation. If your program really DEMANDS more than 550K of conventional memory you will probably never be able to run it under DESQview. As for disc access. I do not know the answer, but I have some ideas as to why such poor performance. I suspect that for optimum disc performance under DESQview you will want to have your disc interleave set at 2 (or 3), unless you have really good buffering or cache (such as on the hard disc controller). Since DESQview is giving time slices to programs (either foreground or background), then a process that is reading from disc is not really able to read continuously (particularly if it is doing its own disc accessing instead of utilizing DOS or the BIOS), and therefore would need to "go around again" to get what it was interrupted at doing the "first time around". Now one must realize that any program running in a multi-tasking environment will NOT run as fast as it would in a single-tasking environment. There will be some performance penalty. It is not as noticeable on a interactive program (like an editor) as on something like a program accessing a disc. But I generally care very little if something that used to take 5 minutes now takes 6 (or 7 or 10) if I can be doing something else at the same time. Yes, I still get caught up in the idea of wanting programs to run faster, but that, I began to realize, was because I did not like to wait. If I can be doing something else instead of simply waiting, then speed is not quite so critical to me.