Xref: utzoo comp.databases:3144 comp.lang.c++:4215 comp.lang.smalltalk:1229
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!cernvax!ethz!ethz-inf!baertsch
From: baertsch@inf.ethz.ch (Martin Baertschi)
Newsgroups: comp.databases,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk
Subject: Re: OODBs summary of replies
Summary: Product Names and Suppliers mixed up
Keywords: database,object
Message-ID: <482@ethz-inf.UUCP>
Date: 31 Jul 89 07:24:03 GMT
References: <1989Jul26.081130.4455@newcastle.ac.uk>
Reply-To: baertschi@inf.ethz.ch (Martin Baertschi)
Followup-To: comp.databases
Organization: Departement fuer Informatik, ETH Zuerich
Lines: 20

In article <1989Jul26.081130.4455@newcastle.ac.uk> 
aidan@shire.newcastle.ac.uk (Aidan Saunders) writes:
>Commercial databases quoted included:-
> G-BASE (GRAPHAEL), Gem-Store(ONTOLOGIC), Static(Symbolics),
> VBase (SERVIO LOGIC) and Generis (DSL).
>dB's from recent research topics detailed included:-
> AVANCE(Stockholm Uni.), GARDEN(Brown Uni.), JASMINE(Fujitsu/AIST
> /MITI), LOB(Compiegne Uni.), OBJFADS/POSTGRES(Berkekey) and
> ORION (MCC).
>Any comments/suggestions.
> 
>             Brian King

Some of the product names and suppliers got mixed up:
Vbase is from ONTOLOGIC (the next version is called OB2),
GemStone is from SERVIO LOGIC.

I am missing IRIS from HP Labs amongst the research projects.

M. Baertschi