Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!uflorida!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: problem with cc compiler
Message-ID: <10620@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 28 Jul 89 19:13:01 GMT
References: <712@unsvax.NEVADA.EDU> <10589@smoke.BRL.MIL> <1185@fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov> <3100@scolex.sco.COM>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 10

In article <3100@scolex.sco.COM> seanf@scolex.UUCP (Sean Fagan) writes:
-In article <10589@smoke.BRL.MIL> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn) writes:
->Standard-conforming C implementations are quite constrained in this
->regard, and would not have invoked your read() function by mistake.
-The only current standard for C makes no mention of that.  That standard, of
-course, is K&R.

If K&R first edition is to be accepted as a standard, then why not K&R
second edition?  I think you're just being silly.  Everyone knew the
context of the discussion.