Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!uhccux!munnari.oz.au!basser!john
From: john@basser.oz (John Mackin)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: What to call a four-place operator
Message-ID: <2425@basser.oz>
Date: 6 Aug 89 17:20:26 GMT
References: <55480@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1989Jul20.152935.14872@utzoo.uucp> <67@motto.UUCP> <18764@mimsy.UUCP> <1389@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> <8515@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <1429@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> <14181@haddock.ima.isc.com> <2422@basser.oz>
Organization: Dept of Comp Sci, Uni of Sydney, Australia
Lines: 40

In article <2422@basser.oz>, I wrote:

> In article <14181@haddock.ima.isc.com> karl@haddock.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) writes:
> 
> > (PS: I think the word for 4-adic is "tetradic" or "quadary", not "quadratic".)
> [...]
> Suggestions are most welcome --

Well, I got two, and they're both right.

    From: Chris Torek <chris@mimsy.umd.edu>

    `Quaternary', of course.

    Chris

This is just the word I couldn't think of (hangs head in shame :-).
And furthermore,

    From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <thorinn@diku.dk>
    Subject: Tetradic

    `Monadic' means `like a monad.'
    `Dyadic' means `like a dyad.'

    They are used just the same when talking about operators.
    It may not be classical, but it's normal.

Thanks for pointing this out, Lars.  I was so hung up on finding a
word that went with `unary' and `binary' that I had forgotten that it
is indeed normal usage to call one- and two-place operators `monadic'
and `dyadic' respectively, so `tetradic' is fine too.

From the Centre for Correct English,

John Mackin, Basser Department of Computer Science,
             University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

john@basser.oz.AU (john%basser.oz.AU@UUNET.UU.NET)
{uunet,mcvax,ukc,nttlab}!munnari!basser.oz!john