Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!ulysses!cjc
From: cjc@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com (Chris Calabrese[mav])
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: What I'd really like to see in an if-statement...
Summary: why reinvent the wheel :-)
Message-ID: <11989@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 8 Aug 89 15:01:52 GMT
References: <5024@alvin.mcnc.org> <1300@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu> <5040@alvin.mcnc.org>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 16

In article <5040@alvin.mcnc.org>, spl@mcnc.org (Steve Lamont) writes:
> Perhaps in ANSI C II (K&R Strike Back?? :-) ) we could add operators .<., .>.,
> .<=., and .>=. (big :-) here ).  Wouldn't you just love to code
> 
> 		( a .<. b .<. c ) ?????

Why do this when we can take advantage of another language which is
an international standard and use the following:
	( a .LE. b .LE. c ) ???

Insert biggest smiley you ever saw here...
-- 
Name:			Christopher J. Calabrese
Brain loaned to:	AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ
att!ulysses!cjc		cjc@ulysses.att.com
Obligatory Quote:	``Anyone who would tell you that would also try and sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.''