Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!rit!tropix!moscom!ur-valhalla!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!sunybcs!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!ukc!pyrltd!slxsys!ibmpcug!ronald
From: ronald@ibmpcug.UUCP (Ronald Khoo)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mush
Subject: mush as Rnmail -h anyone?
Message-ID: <10930@ibmpcug.UUCP>
Date: 22 Jul 89 14:16:36 GMT
Reply-To: ronald@ibmpcug.CO.UK (Ronald Khoo)
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.
Lines: 29

In recent replies to my postings, Barton E. Schaefer <schaefer@ogccse.UUCP>
had me a little confused at first: mail messages with BOTH the correct
news-style Newsgroups, References, etc. headers AND X-Mailer: MUSH !
(Together with Bart's favourite X-Presidents :-)

At first, I thought I'd missed something, but after a quick RTFM, realised
that Bart must have saved the news message into a mailbox and replied from
there, but that got me thinking, why not implement the -h option in mush,
to startup in mail originate mode (a la mail -iE) taking the filename arg
as the edit text, (if you must - fix your paranoid From: 's first) ?

Then I can have my replies from within rn look every bit as impressive as
Bart's :-)

I'd volunteer to do it, but I still can't figure if my modification of
	long copy_flgs = 0;
to
	long copy_flgs = flags;
in line 739 of mail.c (to fix my earlier grumble about ! $alwaysignore
being ignored...) breaks anything - i.e. not yet qualified to hack
mush until I have a spare week to read the source...

How 'bout it Bart, Dan? Mush 7.0 maybe? :-)

-- 
Ronald Khoo @ The IBM PC User Group, PO Box 360, Harrow HA1 4LQ
Phone:	+44 -1- 863 1191			Domain:	ronald@ibmpcug.CO.UK
Path:	...!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!ronald    	Fax:    +44 -1- 863 6095
              My Opinions? Sell 'em if you can. See if I care!