Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!sun-barr!decwrl!ucbvax!agate!eris.berkeley.edu!mwm From: mwm@eris.berkeley.edu (Mike (I'll think of something yet) Meyer) Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: Software, development & copyrights Message-ID: <26942@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 4 Aug 89 00:08:46 GMT References: <26@ark1.nswc.navy.mil> <26879@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <5487@ficc.uu.net> Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mwm@eris.berkeley.edu (Mike (I'll think of something yet) Meyer) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 38 In article <5487@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes: , mwm@eris.berkeley.edu (Mike (I'll think of something yet) Meyer) writes: <> Ok. Let's take an example I'm familiar with (as opposed to Ferranti, <> which I'm not), and consider passenger cars. A company produces those, <> and charges some extra amount for whatever software is on board. Now, <> assume they make the source code to that software available. Two <> things happen: 1) those people who sell roms to change the performance <> now have an easier job, and can charge marginally less for the roms. < If you prefixed that with "to maximize profits," I'd agree. However, I <> don't think you've demonstrated a need other than that. That's not <> sufficient. Oh bullstuff. I'm saying that maximizing profits at the expense of everything else is a bad thing.