Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!image.soe.clarkson.edu!news
From: nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Network Printing
Message-ID: <NELSON.89Aug2165948@sun.clarkson.edu>
Date: 2 Aug 89 21:02:00 GMT
References: <44500002@silver>
Sender: news@sun.soe.clarkson.edu
Reply-To: nelson@clutx.clarkson.edu
Organization: Clarkson University, Postdam NY
Lines: 12
In-reply-to: hughes@silver.bacs.indiana.edu's message of 2 Aug 89 19:27:00 GMT

In article <44500002@silver> hughes@silver.bacs.indiana.edu writes:

   ... But does the collective family
   of LPR/LPD/LPQ/LPC/LPRM provide enough functionality *and* reliability
   to satisfy most users (and implementors) for such a large base?

*and* security?  The problem we have here is charging users for the printing
that they do.
--
--russ (nelson@clutx [.bitnet | .clarkson.edu])|(70441.205@compuserve.com)|
       (Russell.Nelson@f360.n260.z1.fidonet.org)|(BH01@GEnie.com :-)