Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!ndosl!fdmetd!steinar From: steinar@fdmetd.uucp (Steinar Overbeck Cook) Newsgroups: comp.software-eng Subject: Re: Heard of CCC? Summary: MUST have support for heterogeneous environments Message-ID: <472@fdmetd.uucp> Date: 27 Jul 89 12:28:08 GMT References: <12852@well.UUCP> Distribution: all Organization: Fellesdata a.s, Oslo, Norway Lines: 29 In article <12852@well.UUCP>, tmh@well.UUCP (Todd M. Hoff) writes: > ......... > > In addition, I'd like to get opinions on what test cases and criteria > to use in evaluating CCC. What problems do people find particularly > vexing? From my point of view the most important thing a software configuration system or integrated development tool should have; is support for developing applications in a *heterogeneous environment*. > What would it take for you to switch away from SCCS and RCS to > CCC? What features must such a system have? What features shouldn't > it have? This does not necessarily mean that you must switch away from SCCS or RCS. We have just finished developing our own SCM which may be used for several types of machines. We use ORACLE to store all sorts of information relating to the projects, systems and modules being developed, SCCS is used only to store the deltas (differences ) for each module. -- Steinar Overbeck Cook, Fellesdata a.s, P.O. Box 248, 0212 OSLO 2, NORWAY Phone : +47 2 52 80 80 Fax : +47 2 52 85 10 E-mail : ...!mcvax!ndosl!fdmetd!steinar or steinar@fdmetd.uucp