Xref: utzoo comp.software-eng:1823 comp.lang.pascal:2170
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!rochester!rit!tropix!moscom!ur-valhalla!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!sunybcs!bingvaxu!leah!rpi!weber.cs.rpi.edu!mcintyre
From: mcintyre@cs.rpi.edu (David McIntyre)
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: Borland's Object-Oriented Pascal--is it worth it?
Keywords: borland pascal object oriented
Message-ID: <5534@rpi.edu>
Date: 22 Jul 89 09:21:35 GMT
References: <2048@orion.cf.uci.edu>
Sender: usenet@rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Lines: 30

Robert Morey writes:
>
>   [ Robert is worried about upgrade problems to TP 5.5 from 4.0]
>

The upgrade to 5.5 should be almost non-existant.  The change from 5.0
to 5.5 is comprised of 4 new keywords: object, virtual, constructor,
and destructor.

If you don't use the new keywords, there is no difference in the language.

However, the new keywords add some neat C++ish abilities, like dynamic
binding of functions, and more complete encapsulation.

For a really nice introduction to the new abilities of 5.5, check out
Michael Floyd's article "Turbo Pascal with Objects" in the July, 1989
issue of Dr. Dobbs.  It is a very good introduction article.  

I think that I am going to order the update next week.  I am going to
be teaching an advanced-programming/data structures course in August,
and I want to talk about some aspects of objective programming.  I will
give you all a short report about what I think after I give ita chance.

				-Dave


Dave "mr question" McIntyre     |      "....say you're thinking about a plate
mcintyre@turing.cs.rpi.edu      |       of shrimp.....and someone says to 
office : 518-276-8633		|	you `plate,' or `shrimp'......"
home   : 518-271-6664		|