Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ctrsol!ginosko!uunet!wugate!wupost!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!joseph
From: JOSEPH@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Which SCSI interface???
Message-ID: <7737@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: 4 Aug 89 16:02:06 GMT
References: <10467@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <11090@polya.Stanford.EDU>
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 10

In article <11090@polya.Stanford.EDU>, rokicki@polya.Stanford.EDU (Tomas G. Rokicki) writes:
> rademach@tramp.Colorado.EDU (Simon Rademacher) writes:
>> Xetec controller . . .  I would suspect its DMA . . .
> I would suspect its DMA too, especially with reports I've heard about
> -tom
 No its not. The brochure I got from Xetec says its DMAx, which is
 different from DMA. Their claim is that this method is better than the
 standard DMA in many respects.

 Tomi