Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ncar!ames!vsi1!teraida!zehntel!donw
From: donw@zehntel.zehntel.com (Don White)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: LIVE! digitizer
Message-ID: <904@zehntel.UUCP>
Date: 8 Aug 89 00:31:20 GMT
References: <4810@ncrcae.Columbia.NCR.COM> <5660048@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM>
Sender: usenet@zehntel.UUCP
Reply-To: donw@zehntel.UUCP (Don White)
Organization: Zehntel, Inc. Walnut Creek, CA
Lines: 18

In article <5660048@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM> charles@hpcvca.CV.HP.COM (Charles Brown) writes:
>I had a LIVE.  In my opinion it is worthless.  It never produced a
>stable image.  HAM did not work at all.  The colors were exceptionally
>bad in all modes.  The software FREQUENTLY caused gurus.  Save your money.
>	Charles Brown	charles@cv.hp.com or charles%hpcvca@hplabs.hp.com

      I NEVER had a GURU from LIVE! I used to have unstable picture quality.

      Then I found 75 Ohm video cable. I had been using phono cables.
      They LOOK the same. Whoops! Greytone pictures look AWESOME. Especially
      in interlace. I agree that HAM is generally not useable, but that 
      may be due to my interest in digitizing images with poor tone quality.

      Oh well. Anyway, it IS a worthwhile product!

      Don White
      PO 271177 Concord, CA. 94527-1177
      zehntel!donw